The justices opted not to rule on a Louisiana redistricting case involving racial gerrymandering.

The Supreme Court is revisiting the Voting Rights Act, potentially altering safeguards against discriminatory voting maps.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas reiterated his push for the court to reevaluate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been imploring his colleagues for decades to gut a crucial part of the iconic ...

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ended discrimination. Understand this 1964 Act's key rules, its landmark provisions against race ...

The court’s choice to punt a key redistricting case signals trouble for the future of the Voting Rights Act. Support ...

Some legal experts are watching to see if the court's ruling ends up joining a string of decisions since 2013 by the court's conservative majority that have limited the scope of the Voting Rights Act ...

Three local groups are planning a rally for Thursday to honor the legacy of Congressman John Lewis and “fight back against ...

Social justice advocates are creating a queer history archive that celebrates Bayard Rustin, a major organizer in the Civil ...

Named for the late Georgia Congressman and staunch voting rights advocate, the bill aims to restore portions of the landmark Voting Rights Act of 1965, including once again requiring ...

Jonquilyn Hill That’s not the only Supreme Court case regarding voting that could impact the Voting Rights Act coming up this summer, correct?