Although it has long triggered fears of meltdowns and radioactive waste, nuclear power is considered an 'extremely safe,' zero-emission power source.

Facing a new space race with China and Russia, NASA is fast-tracking lunar nuclear power development and commercial space ...

Today’s Forbes Daily covers Eli Lilly’s historic loss, the new GPT-5 for OpenAI’s ChatGPT, reactions to Instagram’s new map ...

Science budget? Whatever. It's all about beating China and Russia NASA's Acting Administrator, Sean Duffy, has directed the ...

The reactor would launch to the moon by 2030, according to a directive by Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy that was sent ...

Nuclear reactors in space may sound like something out of science fiction, but they are likely to prove important for ...

NASA announced plans to build a nuclear reactor on the moon on Tuesday, in an attempt to stay ahead of China and Russia in a ...

But NASA’s space nuclear propulsion office continues to explore the concept—most notably, a joint project with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency that aims to test a nuclear-powered ...

Planned for 2035, the nuclear reactor would power research and exploration of the moon's south pole as part of the the International Lunar Research Station project.

China aims to have its astronauts on the moon by 2030 to help build the research station. The United States also has plans to build a lunar base with a nuclear power plant. Nasa and the US ...

Most of the terrestrial supply comes from the decay of tritium, which is a byproduct of nuclear reactors and aging nuclear weapons. The United States has been rationing He-3 since 2010.

NASA doesn’t have to build and operate these reactors, you know, just like we buy power, you know, from the socket, here we buy power, power from the socket on the moon. Why not ?