Inside Climate News12h
What a $660 Million Verdict Means for Greenpeace and the Environmental Movement
A North Dakota jury delivered a crushing blow to the advocacy group that some experts warn could chill free speech. Inside ...
As Energy Transfer-Greenpeace trial nears end, a recap of what’s happened so far
Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the Standing Rock Sioux ...
What the Greenpeace Dakota Access Pipeline Fine Means For the Future of Activism
How SLAPP lawsuits like the one by Energy Transfer against Greenpeace for protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline will impact ...
What the $660 million Greenpeace verdict means for U.S. activism
A North Dakota jury this week found Greenpeace liable for defamation, conspiracy and other claims over its participation in ...
Mother Jones1d
Greenpeace Verdict Stems From “Weaponization of the Legal System,” Advocates Say
The verdict against the environmental group Greenpeace finding it liable for huge damages to a pipeline company over protests ...
Greenpeace Verdict a Wake-Up Call for Progressive NGOs
If the verdict stands, Greenpeace will have to pay $667 million in damages to Energy Transfer, which built and owns the ...
Litigators of the Week: The Developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline Hits Greenpeace With a $667M Trial Verdict
After a three-week trial, state court jurors in North Dakota found that Greenpeace incited violence by protestors and defamed ...
Greenpeace vows more legal action after getting hit with $660M ruling that would 'shut down' organization
Greenpeace vowed to appeal a North Dakota jury's ruling forcing them to pay $660 million in damages for their protest efforts ...