Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158 (1992) - Justia US Supreme Court Center
WEBWhen Cole refused to comply, Wyatt brought suit in Federal District Court, challenging the constitutionality of the statute and seeking injunctive relief and damages from respondents, the county sheriff, and the deputies involved in the seizure.
Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158 - CourtListener
WEBDec 14, 2001 · Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158. 40 judge-written summaries of this opinion from other cases. We looked through our complete case law collection for parenthetical summaries of this case and organized them into 18 groups.
Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158 (1992): Case Brief Summary - Quimbee
WEBWyatt sued Cole in federal district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arguing that Cole’s seizure of Wyatt’s property under the Mississippi statute was unconstitutional. The district court held that Cole, with the help of the sheriff, violated Wyatt’s constitutional rights, but that Cole was entitled to qualified immunity.
Wyatt v. Cole (1992) Overview | LSData Case Brief Video Summary
WEBThis case is about a dispute over cattle ownership that arose from a state statute that allowed individuals to obtain a court order to seize their property from another person. The petitioner ...
U.S. Reports: Wyatt v. Cole et al., 504 U.S. 158 (1992).
WEBWashington Conference: Keynote Address The Law Library and the Constitution Project cosponsored a day-long conference on the right to the effective assistance of counsel and, in particular, the case of Strickland v. Washington.
Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158 (1992) - United States Supreme Court
WEBWith the assistance of respondent Robbins, an attorney, respondent Cole filed a complaint under the Mississippi replevin statute against his partner, petitioner Wyatt.
Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158, 7 (1992) - United States Supreme …
WEBRespondents do not contend that private parties who instituted attachment proceedings and who were subsequently sued for malicious prosecution or abuse of process were entitled to absolute immunity. And with good reason; although public prosecutors and judges were accorded absolute immunity at common law, Imbler v.
Wyatt v. Cole, 504 U.S. 158, 5 (1992) - United States Supreme …
WEBCiting Lugar, the District Court assumed that Cole, by invoking the state statute, had acted under color of state law within the meaning of § 1983, and was therefore liable for damages for the deprivation of Wyatt's due process rights. App.
Wyatt v. Cole Case Brief for Law School · LSData
WEBWyatt v. Cole Case Brief Summary: In this case, a person challenged the constitutionality of a state statute that allowed property to be seized, and private defendants who had used the statute were facing liability under § 1983.
MC Law Digital Commons | Mississippi College School of Law …
WEBMC Law Digital Commons | Mississippi College School of Law Research
- Some results have been removed